Housemaid slumps after getting a 28yr jail sentence for stealing N35m jewellery | This Is Miss Petite Nigeria Blog

Monday, 8 July 2013

Housemaid slumps after getting a 28yr jail sentence for stealing N35m jewellery

A housemaid, Mary John, has been sentenced to 28 years in prison for stealing her mistress’ jewellery estimated at N35m.

The 30-year-old woman slumped moments after hearing the sentence, hitting her head against the carpeted surface of the court room.

The impact shook the walls of the court room, but she was quickly resuscitated and carried out by prison warders.The convict had been arraigned since September 2012 on four counts of conspiracy, entry, breaking and stealing.

Her mistress, Mrs. Esohe Kadiri, a lawyer, said she stole wristwatches valued at N9m, bangles and bracelets worth N10m, diamond set worth N8m, rings worth N3m, chains and pendants worth N5m, and a camera priced at N100, 000, which all totalled N35, 100,000.



The theft was said to have occurred in July 2012 at her residence in Victoria Garden City, Ajah.

Kadiri, in her evidence before the court said John took advantage of her travel outside the country to perpetrate the theft.She said she was alerted to the crime by her sister, and after challenging John on phone, she suddenly became incommunicado.

Together with three other witnesses- Kelvin Ikeagwe, Francis Ugbem and Inspector Patrick Onu- 34 exhibits were tendered to nail the accused.John, however, in her oral testimony, told the court she was hypnotised by some men whom she met on the road.

She also claimed she was taken to an herbalist’s house where she was told that if she told anyone about her experience, she would die.

She said she took the men to her mistress’ residence, and they broke through the burglar  proof door to steal the items.

The magistrate, Mrs. Aje Afunwa, in her ruling however observed that the defendant’s written statement was inconsistent with her oral evidence.

She said John had indeed confessed to the crime in her written evidence which the court would admit as true.

She said, “In her evidence, she confessed to breaking the door, climbing the house and stealing the jewellery.

“I choose to believe more the defendant’s written statement than her oral evidence which is an attempt to shift the blame to another person. I believe her oral statement is a figment of her imagination.

“More so, hypnotism or superstition is a phenomenon which is not admissible in law.”

She further referred to her demeanor which she said did not show any sign of “one whose eyes had just been cleared of hypnotism.”

Afunwa said John did not show any remorse or regret for her action and hence deserved full punishment for her action.

She said, “I strongly believe that the defendant stole the items by herself with the help of another person who is at large.

“In view of the rampancy of such a crime where house helps, clerks and servants engage in the stealing of the property of their employer, this honourable court will not be lenient with the accused to serve as a deterrent to others.

“I therefore find the defendant guilty on the four counts of conspiracy, breaking, felony and stealing. She is to serve a prison term of seven years on each count, with hard labour, and the terms are to run concurrently for a maximum of seven years.

“And probably while serving her jail term, she would have a change of heart and probably confess as to where the jewellery is.”

Punch

21 comments:

  1. Hahahahahahahahahhhahahaha she never slump finish

    ReplyDelete
  2. Funny, chei 28 Years
    www.emmanuelbabatunde.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Make them pour her water if she slumps again

    ReplyDelete
  4. Haha but the sentence too na wah. It's too much abegi

    ReplyDelete
  5. The bad thing is, she probably gave a boyfriend the jewelry to keep and he has absconded.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Abegi d madam jst use personal vendetta 2 punish d girl,evrythng 35m choi! Pple no dey fear God. D tory jst funny sha wit dat amt. 28yrs no b small thng na it d house girl sey mke she kukuma serve am 4 death nau.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Na wah oh. What's with house girls and stealing these days?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why are babes spreading their legs for cash? The answer poverty. Why are house girls stealing? Same answer. Poverty.

      Delete
  8. I guess she didn't steal jewelry more than 1 million. The madam just inflated it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nigeria wch way? 28 yrs for what? And they were quick to finish the case n pass judgement. But when criminals in the name of politicians are arrested for crimes much worse than this ladies it is swept under the carpet. God ve mercy on us.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Is this for real? 28 yrs is what some people get for murder in other countries. This judgement is indeed too harsh. I think punishments are meant to be for reformation of character, 2 years would have been ok. She is probably young with a lot of future before her, but all is now taken away.
    I think the madam is wicked and took advantage of the fact that the lady in question is an illiterate who also couldn't afford to get a good lawyers.

    Shrek

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sorry, I meant lawyer not lawyers

    Shrek

    ReplyDelete
  12. 28 years jail time? I weep for the nigerian judicial system.
    A young man similarly bagged 50 years jail term for stealing a governor's handset.
    The pencom thief paid 750k fine for stealing billions of pensioners gratuity. The day of reckoning is coming for the political and judiciary class.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Rebel, it's not 'jail time' but 'jail term' . Ok?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 19:24
      Thanks for da correction. It was actually this tablet's auto-spell function going haywire.
      In my 3rd sentence, jail term was used. So pls get off my back. Lol. Just kidding

      Delete
  14. Shrek says so

    ReplyDelete
  15. It is sad, the 28 years appears excessive. What if the Lady's story is true that she was a victim of hypnotic display? As we all know Getting written confession in nigeria through our Police can not be relied. The judge/magistrate basing her ruling on the fact that she believed the written statement as agaainst the oral testimony during trial make her a bias and opinionated umpire. Better investigation and more facts should have been presented that should warrant the excessive punishment. I felt sorry for the poor lady.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Smh for dis country. Am sure it was d pOlice dat told her wat to write in d written statement after mad beatin

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wait o hw d madam come tk get 35milion worth of jewlries? Den wetin go dey her account? Ds woman shld b chased criously by EFCC

    ReplyDelete
  18. How will some1 get jewlries wiv such amount of money?! Nd 28years is too much plssssss...this is evil!!!!

    ReplyDelete



For Inquiries/Tipoff emepretty@gmail.com - Call 08095369321